How Some Asset Owners and Managers are Using Technology to Gain Portfolio Insights

Technology, with human involvement, can improve efficiency and enable innovation in portfolio management, sources say.

Art by Pete Ryan


Many asset owners have sustainable investing mandates, but to find insights beyond simple environmental, social and governance metrics supplied by index providers requires analyzing alternative data using advanced technology.

APG Asset Management wanted to turn the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals into sustainable investments. To create a framework to translate those goals into sustainable development investments, it joined with PGGM, AustralianSuper and the British Columbia Investment Management Corporation to create the SDI AOP Design Authority.

APG’s Entis division used a combination of structured and unstructured data, artificial intelligence and machine learning, all with human oversight, to compile a dataset of more than 2,200 companies to measure how their products or services are linked to the U.N.’s goals.

Never miss a story — sign up for CIO newsletters to stay up-to-date on the latest institutional investment industry news.

The latest innovation relates to patents, and Entis scores 2,200 companies on 130 technology themes related to the 11 SDGs. Investors can learn where companies spend their research and development money and how that aligns with sustainability. The information is useful on two levels: sustainability and innovation, says Peter Branner, APG Asset Management’s CIO.

“It’s not only about sustainability, but it’s also about leadership in general,” he says.

In addition to managers like APG, asset owners are using technology to gain greater portfolio insight and are becoming more efficient, letting them spend on more value-added tasks. As markets become more volatile, CIOs need to know what assets they own, where those assets are and how they are performing, as quickly as possible.

Tony Payne, senior vice president of technology and innovation and chief technology officer at BCI, says it is making a big technological push as part of a strategic plan at the $154.41 billion asset manager for British Columbia’s public sector.

BCI is internalizing more of its portfolio management, Payne says, so its portfolio managers need to learn more technology and how to think digitally.

“Portfolio managers or investors, traditionally, focus a lot on processes. But to be relevant and to be ahead of the game, they need to be digital investors,” he says.

BCI uses several tools to support trade execution, investment management, portfolio monitoring and administration capabilities for its public markets and alternative asset classes. The fund created a data ecosystem it named ‘data marketplace,’ another way to explain the tech industry term of data lakehouse, which automatically connects the data from across BCI to where it is needed, eliminating extra time and increasing the accuracy in moving data.

Payne says BCI uses the data marketplace to create new, monthly Management Investment Committee reports, which helps inform how its members make decisions. “Our [data marketplace] service reduced the production time of these reports by 70%, transforming static reports into digital tools that tell the story behind the numbers. As flexible reports, they easily pivot to answer ‘what if’ questions from the committee, offering users myriad applications,” he says.

Building or Buying

Ashby Monk, executive director at Stanford Research Initiative on Long Term Investing, says asset owners generally use technology to focus on portfolio management, spending many of their technology dollars around collecting unstructured and structured data, normalizing all the different formats used by custodians, private markets managers and other third parties. Once the data is uniform, it can be warehoused and pulled into dashboards to reveal portfolio construction.

“Once the platform is in place, you can start to run novel analytics and augment that platform with alternative data and ESG data, and that’s where you get new insights about your portfolio,” he says.

Sudhir Nair, global head of BlackRock’s Aladdin platform, concurs. He says when CIOs speak to him about using Aladdin, they initially ask complex questions, such as how to use AI, but often struggle to answer the easier questions, like what’s in their portfolio, where the assets are located and portfolio performance. They have to answer those questions first before moving to advanced tools.

Answering these questions starts to set the foundational infrastructure and architecture of managing portfolios, says Eric Poirier, CEO of wealth management platform Addepar.

“What is that core platform solving for? It’s giving me a very precise understanding of every part of my portfolio, exactly where I am right now, so I don’t have to do that manually,” Poirier says.

The asset owners who are investing most heavily in technology have internal direct investment capabilities, Monk says. But to custom-build systems in-house also requires having a robust IT staff that can design data governance and procure analytics to decipher alternative data.

BCI custom-built its investment strategies system, which it calls the Strategic Asset Allocation System, allowing a holistic management of its clients’ investment strategies through the entire investment management life cycle and more sophisticated modeling. With enhanced data and calculation robustness, such as the use of forward-looking data, Payne believes BCI will improve the speed, depth and quality of communication for stakeholders.

Jon-Michael Consalvo, managing director at the Carnegie Corporation of New York, says the organization has improved how it uses technology internally to enhance decisionmaking

“We haven’t developed a fully centralized data warehouse yet, but we are making progress toward this,” he says, with the goal to be able to answer stakeholder questions quickly and accurately.

Technology investments allowed Carnegie to use investment techniques in areas like risk management and return decomposition that were previously out of reach because the necessary information would have been too costly to produce.

“It led us to correct for some overlapping exposures that wouldn’t have been immediately apparent with the resources we had 10 years ago,” Consalvo says.

Technology can help asset owners figure out what makes their organization unique. Nair says Aladdin managers often spend time with a client’s investment to better understand how they think about the portfolio. “We spend a lot of time first understanding what [are] their strategy and their strategic goals, how they think about their workflows … to map what they do today into what we feel is industry best practice,” he says.

The California State Teachers’ Retirement System uses both the Aladdin portfolio management system and multiple solutions from CalSTRS’ custodian, State Street Bank and Trust, among other software programs, to manage its portfolio, according to Rebecca Foree, media relations manager at $307.2 billion CalSTRS.

The pension fund is seeking ways to enhance its existing technology infrastructure, including how to add cloud-based data management and business analytics solutions. According to the spokesperson, these options could provide deeper analysis on complex investments, as well as more robust management of special-purpose datasets, such as those for CalSTRS’ net-zero initiative and diversity profiles.

How APG Uses Technology

The $553 billion APG uses many different types of technology, everything from Microsoft Dynamics for workflow management to a proprietary, in-house platform, EQUIP, for quant investing. Some globally based investment teams use the open-source programming language Python with machine-learning software TensorFlow and PySpark, which lets managers analyze large amounts of structured or semi-structured data, to create strategies and construct portfolios.

Branner says APG provides training for its programming staff, but also for portfolio managers, middle managers, executives and others as they push to further digitize. There is also a collaborative approach to using technology, as every quarter APG invites staff to discuss what data they have analyzed and to share their best ideas, both to inspire and to give credit.

“It’s important that you celebrate small successes,” he says.

Technology also enhances in-person interactions. APG uses business analytics tool Qlik for many of the internal and external reports they create, which can be accessed by clients at any time.

Client meetings are “more hands-on because clients can look at live data and they can drill down according to what the client is asking in the meeting directly,” Branner says.

Quantitative and Qualitative

The focus on technology is often a quantitative exercise or a focus on efficiency. Clint Coghill, CEO and co-founder of the Backstop Solutions Group, says technology may also lead to questions about why an asset owner has a particular holding or is using a certain manager.

“It’s really powerful to understand what you own, why you own it, what are the other alternatives? There’s quantitative information, and there’s qualitative information,” he says.

With BCI’s tech abilities expanding, Payne says he is excited to focus on innovation, using artificial intelligence and machine learning to begin creating signals for their investors to help them make good decisions faster and more broadly. He admits AI is a buzzword right now, but “it’s really how you apply it in organizations.”

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Private Market Technology Investments Are Here to Stay

After an immensely challenging year for technology companies, professional investors discuss the reasons why private technology assets are still compelling investments.

Art by Pete Ryan


“Technology is in everything that we touch, whether that’s food, medicine or commercially. It’s penetrating a lot of these areas to help solve some really big real-world problems, and I think that means it’s here to stay,” said Joshua Beers, head of private equity at independent investment consulting firm NEPC, when prompted to give an outlook on private technology assets for 2023.

Despite its prevalence in so many sectors, 2022 was not kind to technology investors. According to Goldman Sachs’ December special issue regarding global macro research, the Goldman Sachs Non-Profitable Tech Index (a measure of public equities) lost more than 50% through 2022.

The discounted-cash-flow model and its emphasis as a fundamental valuation tool is often to blame for the collapse of risk assets’ prices, from a theoretical standpoint. The DCF model uses expected future cash flows to evaluate a company against the risk-free rate of return.

 

For more stories like this, sign up for the CIO Alert newsletter.

Higher interest rates diminish the future value of cash flows created by an enterprise when compared to the discount rate, an effect which takes into account the time value of money and that money is worth more now, at present, than it will be in the future. Thus, by this model, the present value of companies automatically falls when applying a higher discount rate.

 

Because the tech sector often offers investors unprofitable enterprises pledging future cash flows, it has been punished.

 

Market participants in private markets have already seen valuations falter, and private technology assets are not immune to the valuation crunch seen in the technology sector in public markets. “I think we’re going to see [valuations depreciating] more holistically [in 2023],” Beers says.

 

So-called ‘unicorn’ companies, or private companies with valuations greater than $1 billion, fell 48.3% last year to 308 at the end of November 2022, compared to 596 at the end of 2021, according to Pitchbook data. “When you think about simple investment theory—buy low and sell high—we think that it’s starting to set up for an environment where that could happen,” Beers offers, noting that the drop in valuations could create buying opportunities.

Moreover, private assets enjoy the pliability of not being regularly marked to market, alleviating some of the paper losses experienced in public markets.

 

“What’s benefited private investors, in particular, are the growth rates within private portfolios. [For many investors, they are] significantly higher than the growth rate in public markets,” says Miguel Luiña, managing director of fund investments at Hamilton Lane. “As multiples come down, that growth rate can offset those multiple declines, so if you have a 50% reduction in that multiple, but the company is growing 50% year over year, that’s going to help quite a bit, because you’re growing into that valuation.”

 

Better yet than any accounting procedures or growth rates is the way the tech sector is set up entering 2023. It is almost a natural law of markets that some of the worst performing sectors the prior year will rebound to be some of the best performing sectors the following year. In 2020, of the 11 sectors in the S&P 500, energy performed the worst, falling 33.7%, and real estate second worst, falling 2.2%, according to Statista. In 2021, energy and real estate were the two highest performing S&P 500 sectors.

Additionally, information technology, as a sector in the S&P 500, has only had two negative yielding years since 2010: 2022, when the sector fell 29.6%, and 2018, when the sector fell 0.3%, according to Yardeni Research.

“The long-term growth dynamics of tech-enabled businesses [haven’t] changed because the stock market is up or down; we look at it over a much longer-term holding period,” says Jeffrey Stevenson, the managing partner in VSS, a structured capital investor that invests in healthcare, education and business services technology companies in the lower middle market. “Now is actually an interesting time to be investing in these kinds of businesses.”

 

But just because an opportunity exists for buyers, does not mean sellers will be happy to close deals at lower evaluations. Stevenson indicates that 2023 will be a markedly tough year for private equity exits. He suggests that buyers and investment committees are being much more cautious and conservative in valuing businesses, noting that deal sale processes are being deferred or cancelled.

 

Valuations, having fallen in 2022, may provide headwinds for exits for the foreseeable future, though Stevenson sees the lack of exit activity and lack of appetite for lofty multiples as good for private credit strategies.

 

“The typical path for an exit of a technology company is an IPO,” Beers says. “We’ve come off a period in which IPOs have been fairly robust. Now that window is essentially closed, and I suspect it will be closed for some time.”

 

While Beers attributes the lack of activity in the IPO market to valuation concerns, Luiña says “not going public is more of a choice than it is the market forces upon them. In the late [1990s], venture companies were funded typically through Series A, Series B and Series C rounds. There was very little private growth equity capital available, so companies really needed to tap the public markets to continue their growth trajectory. A lot of the value creation and a lot of the growth in those companies happened within the public markets.”

 

Beers verifies that companies are not limited to simply going public to access financing options or exits, as was the case decades ago. “There’s been a growing trend of [general partner]-led secondaries-type transactions in the form of continuation funds,” he says. “Activity in the venture world will start to pick up, providing liquidity to [limited partners] and some longer funds.”

 

Higher interest rates produce more outcomes than just lower valuations and tighter liquidity conditions. Furthermore, not all outcomes of higher interest rates are negative: Some outcomes create positive net externalities for the venture space and private tech assets.

 

“I think there will be less innovation, at least in terms of bad ideas getting financed,” quips Stevenson on the long-term effect of rising interest rates’ impact on innovation in the technology sector. “The cream always rises to the top, and the deals that never should have been financed in the first place will probably not get financed. Innovation will continue because it makes sense, and the demand [for innovative technology solutions] will always be there.”

 

Luiña agrees that tighter economic conditions can “have a very positive trend on venture performance,” citing less competition among investors to get into new deals; a stronger focus on proving a business model earlier in a company’s existence; reaching more milestones ahead of Series A financing rounds; and, “theoretically, investors allocating less to companies that ultimately fail, limiting the write-off ratio.”

 

Moreover, higher interest rates do make private credit opportunities more attractive, because a higher yield is now attached to the product.

 

“In private credit, there will be fewer deals, with leverage multiples lower and interest rates higher. Deals will end up having less risk, but with a better return profile,” says Stevenson. “Private credit that’s got an equity twist to it has two advantages: One is that you generate above average current income. … Secondly, you can participate in the equity upside. In general, you can generate consistently higher rates of return [from structured capital].”

 

Luiña favors venture equity as an approach to invest in the asset class.

 

“I think there’s an attractive market within venture. The biggest driver of venture returns is the underlying success of the company’s operating performance, and less so the market environment that you have,” he says. “Taking a look at some of the recent tech companies that have gone public and reached $25 billion, $50 billion­ plus market caps, even if you slash that in half, an early-stage investor that came into these companies at less than $1 billion dollar valuation, or less than $100 million, they’re still going to do really well, even in a tighter environment.”

 

Beers cites health-care technology as the most exciting investment sector in the private technology asset class, a class he believes vital to solving problems of the future.

 

 “(Technology) is what is going to change the world, at the end of the day,” Beers says. “So if we think about climate change, or other factors that we’re dealing with—to bridge those gaps, technology will have to kind of step in and play an important role.”

Related Stories:

 

Inside the World of Private Equity: Anxiety, Elation and Sangfroid

 

Private Equity, the Hot Asset Class for Allocators, Faces Headwinds

 

Private Credit: Too Risky? Not for Asset Allocators

 

 

 

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

«